Skip to content
ABOGADO.COM.PH
Senate Impeachment Court spokesperson Regie Tongol discussing the VP Sara Duterte impeachment trial during a television interview.

VP Sara trial to continue if SC petition filed, unless TRO issued, says impeachment court spox

  • September 24, 2026

By ABOGADO.COM.PH Staff

Twitter Facebook Messenger Telegram Viber WhatsApp Copy Link

Senate Impeachment Court spokesperson Regie Tongol said the trial of Vice President Sara Duterte would continue even if her camp files a Supreme Court petition challenging the new rule on the denominator for the two-thirds vote to convict, unless a temporary restraining order is issued.

Tongol said that the Impeachment Court would not wait for any petition to be resolved before continuing the trial.

Speaking on Bilyonaryo News Channel’s “MEMO with Korina,” Tongol said the rules of the Impeachment Court state that any pending Supreme Court petition under Rule 65 would not halt the proceedings, unless a TRO is issued.

“I-implement lamang ng Impeachment Court yung letra ng rules na iyon,” Tongol said.

Duterte’s camp earlier said that it may challenge before the Supreme Court the new interpretation that the two-thirds vote required to convict would only be based on senators who can “legally and factually” participate in the impeachment proceedings.

This would exclude those who are detained, in hiding, suspended, or have a physical or medical incapacity.

Tongol said the Impeachment Court has expected the two-thirds vote interpretation to be challenged before the Supreme Court from the start, even when Presiding Officer Sen. Francis Escudero ruled that the vote to convict is set at 16, which is two-thirds of the Senate’s 24 total members.

Escudero’s interpretation was revised by the new rule.

“Umpisa pa lang, hindi naman natatakot ang Impeachment Court doon sa possible exhaustion of remedies by any party that is aggrieved,” Tongol said.

But he also said that any party might be hard pressed to show that the Impeachment Court committed grave abuse of discretion, when it took its time to deliberate on the two-thirds vote issue before coming up with its new rule.

He also said the Supreme Court might find that this is a political question or that there is no justiciable question because it involves a co-equal branch of government that has exercised its powers.

Twitter Facebook Messenger Telegram Viber WhatsApp Copy Link

FEATURED STORIES

Senators Francis Pangilinan and Risa Hontiveros condemning Chinese Ambassador Jing Quan over threatening remarks.

‘We don’t need arrogant diplomats’: Lawmakers slam Chinese Ambassador’s threats

October 17, 2026

DILG links ex-Bangsamoro parliament member to P3.5B attempted shabu smuggling

October 16, 2026

Marcos to summon Chinese diplomat over remarks about use of force in maritime dispute

October 16, 2026

MORE ON ABOGADO.COM.PH

DivinaLaw lawyers enjoying their annual firm retreat in Switzerland during their 20th anniversary celebration.

No objections: DivinaLaw abogados take a Swiss getaway

October 17, 2026

Justice Gito marks his second year in the Sandiganbayan

October 17, 2026

Sandiganbayan acquits Janette Garin, 4 other DOH officials in P3.56B Dengvaxia case

October 13, 2026
Justice Mural created by former PDLs displayed at the UP Law Center in Bocobo Hall, UP Diliman.

Justice Mural’ by ex-PDLs to be unveiled at UP Law Center

September 16, 2026
Show more

ADVERTISEMENT

BACK TO TOP

ABOGADO is a member of ABANTE-BILYONARYO GROUP

BILYONARYO
BILYONARYO

ABOGADO is a member of ABANTE-BILYONARYO GROUP

ADVERTISEMENT

BACK TO TOP
Home
Featured News
Snitch
Law Firm
Court Case
Campus
Column
Foreign
About Us

© 2017 - 2025 All rights Reserved. Abogado.com.ph

Home
Featured News
Snitch
Law Firm
Court Case
Campus
Foreign
Column
About Us