Skip to content
ABOGADO.COM.PH

Panelo: CJ aspirants wary of displeasing Marcos, may delay SC rulings

  • September 11, 2026

By ABOGADO.COM.PH Staff

Twitter Facebook Messenger Telegram Viber WhatsApp Copy Link

Former Duterte chief presidential legal counsel Salvador Panelo on Friday claimed that some Supreme Court justices aspiring for the chief justice post may be hesitant to rule on politically charged cases because they do not want to displease the appointing power, President Ferdinand Marcos Jr.

“Alam mo ang problema kasi dyan, marami gusto maging Chief Justice (among the current SC justices). Kaya ang iba dyan, hindi makagalaw. Ayaw nila syempre ma-disappoint the powers that be. Kaya yan ang magiging problema,” Panelo said.

Panelo made the statement during an interview on Bilyonaryo News Channel’s At The Forefront with Atty. Karen Jimeno.

Panelo was asked whether the SC might delay ruling on politically charged cases until a new chief justice is appointed because incumbent Chief Justice Alexander Gesmundo is due to retire in November.

He was also asked whether the SC would timely act on Vice President Sara Duterte’s urgent motion asking the tribunal to rule on her plea for a temporary restraining order and/or writ of preliminary injunction in relation to her grave threats case.

Panelo said the SC would eventually rule on Duterte’s petition but could not say when.

“It will rule. But whether or not it will rule now or a few weeks from now or forever pending in its court, hindi natin alam yan,” he said.

Panelo cited SC’s slow action on some cases, including the habeas corpus petition filed by the children of former President Rodrigo Duterte in connection with his transfer to The Hague.

“Even the history, mawalang galang sa SC, parang by the time nagru-rule kayo moot and academic na. Habeas Corpus nga namin, isang taon na, nandiyan pa rin,” Panelo said.

He acknowledged, however, that the SC can act quickly when it wants to by citing its action on the impeachment issue.

“But having said that, although yun na nga ang SC mabagal, pero kung gusto nakaka-resolve. Kagaya sa impeachment, di ba? Ang bilis, din-declare nila unconstitutional,” Panelo said.

“So we’re just hoping na sana aksyonan na nila (ang petition/motion ni VP Sara),” he added.

Panelo questioned why justices would hesitate to decide the cases, saying the delay could create doubts among the public.

“I cannot even understand why they are afraid or if they are not afraid, why are you delayed?” he said.

“Parang dating kasi sa taong bayan, bakit ba hindi kayo maka-decide? Kadali lang naman ang decision dyan,’ Panelo added.#

Twitter Facebook Messenger Telegram Viber WhatsApp Copy Link

FEATURED STORIES

Old and frail, but fit for trial: ICC rejects Duterte’s cognitive decline defense

October 9, 2026

19 candidates vie for SC associate justice post

October 8, 2026
Justice Secretary Fredderick Vida speaking about the public restraint on sharing violent content online.

DOJ warns fake PWD ID issuers, users may face criminal charges

October 8, 2026

MORE ON ABOGADO.COM.PH

SyCipLaw names new litigation, banking department heads

October 6, 2026

Good design makes people feel welcome: Liza Marcos hails ASEAN architecture festival

October 9, 2026

SC upholds cancellation of life insurance over nondisclosure

October 7, 2026
Justice Mural created by former PDLs displayed at the UP Law Center in Bocobo Hall, UP Diliman.

Justice Mural’ by ex-PDLs to be unveiled at UP Law Center

September 16, 2026
Show more

ADVERTISEMENT

BACK TO TOP

ABOGADO is a member of ABANTE-BILYONARYO GROUP

BILYONARYO
BILYONARYO

ABOGADO is a member of ABANTE-BILYONARYO GROUP

ADVERTISEMENT

BACK TO TOP
Home
Featured News
Snitch
Law Firm
Court Case
Campus
Column
Foreign
About Us

© 2017 - 2025 All rights Reserved. Abogado.com.ph

Home
Featured News
Snitch
Law Firm
Court Case
Campus
Foreign
Column
About Us