Bersamin: I was fair and impartial in Marcos electoral protest
Former chief justice Lucas Bersamin disclosed that he was fair and impartial in the electoral protest filed by former senator Ferdinand Marcos Jr. agains Vice President Leni Robredo.
“Hindi pwedeng lutuan sa Supreme Court kasi 15 members ‘yan, very strong and independent minded any mga justices, ” he pointed out.
Recently, the Presidential Electoral Tribunal ordered the release to the camps of Robredo and Marcos the report on the revision and appreciation of ballots in the three pilot provinces, and for them to comment on it.
Likewise, the PET required parties to submit a memoranda on the various issues relating to the jurisdiction and other matters relating to the third cause of action.
The third cause of action is the annulment of election results for vice president in the provinces of Lanao del Sur, Basilan, and Maguindanao within 20 days from receipt.
Also, Robredo reiterated her previous plea for PET to apply Rule 65 in resolving the electoral protest Marcos.
Under Rule 65 of the 2010 Rules of the PET, the tribunal would decide whether or not to proceed with Marcos protest based on the results of the initial recount of votes in the three pilot provinces.
The pilot provinces were Camarines Sur, Iloilo, and Negros Oriental, all of which were chosen by Marcos.
The filing of the manifestation was prompted by reports that PET opted to “abandon” Rule 65 as it voted to proceed with the recount of Marcos’ votes in non-pilot provinces.
Robredo won the vice presidential race in the May 2016 polls with 14,418,817 votes or 263,473 more than Marcos’ 14,155,344 votes.
But in his protest, Marcos contested the results in a total of 132,446 precincts in 39,221 clustered precincts covering 27 provinces and cities.
He named three provinces where he can supposedly prove that irregularities marred the conduct of the 2016 national and local elections.